User talk:UtherSRG
This is UtherSRG's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
It is 11:51 AM where this user lives. |
zOMG
[edit]zOMG | ||
I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk |
WikiProject Mammals Notice Board
[edit]Happy holidays!
[edit]
— mw (talk) (contribs) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Happy Birthday!
[edit]Happy birthday! Hi UtherSRG! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
Important notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 177.76.240.32 (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Paradoxurus
[edit]At Paradoxurus, this is not WP:LIMITED. This content has issues of close paraphrasing/copying. For example: "deeply constricted shortly behind the well-developed postorbital processes" is closely paraprhasing the source text "deeply constricted a short distance behind the well-developed postorbital processes". An example of exact copying is "is considerably narrower than the interorbital area and than the muzzle above the canines". Therefore, this content needs to be removed as a copyright violation. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Let's keep this all on the article's talk. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:16, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Local link error
[edit]On the edit page for Causus lichtensteinii you added a "local link" for herpetologist David Mallow, which directs to the WP article for retired voice actor Dave Mallow. I don't think that they are the same person. My computer skills are limited, and I don't know how to create a "local link". Could you please correct this situation for me. Perhaps you could do something like you did for David Ludwig (herpetologist). Thank you. Lyttle-Wight (talk) 01:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Good catch. I've made the fix now. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! Lyttle-Wight (talk) 12:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
My edit on Cougar
[edit]Good morning,
In the Manual of Style, it says there is no consistent style that needs to be maintained for this kind of writing but it should adhere to the style of the article. As the rest of the article is formatted the way I edited, why are parentheses inappropriate? I am not saying you are wrong I am just trying to understand for the future. Thank you. Akyyka (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Parenthesis aren't a stylistic choice. For animal taxa, they indicate if that taxa name was how the author used it (no parens) or was moved after the authors naming (with parens). - UtherSRG (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Jagirani page
[edit]Breh all proof are mentioned in page why sent to draft Jagirani110 (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- I already explained in my message on your talk page. I have provided additional info just now. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- do you create jagirani page?
- in page views show? Jagirani110 (talk) 12:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- After I moved your version to the draft namesapce, I recreated the redirect that existed before your edits. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
This appears not to be totally straightforward
[edit]We have an editor Foo123 which has created a draft about the Foo tribe. As a member of the tribe they have an apparent COI. Had they created a draft about the Nation of Foo, would they also have a COI? They also appear to have a better command of the Fooian Language than of English.
I'm intertested in what you hope I am going to be able to achieve here, please? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- You were able to calmly work with the author of Draft:Bruse Wane to get them to understand what is needed. I'm hoping for the same here. Asking early to avoid the level of animosity in the former. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think we stand a chance. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- The discussion is taking place on my talk page. You are most welcome to contribute. Thank you for your compliment. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll go make some popcorn and watch the show... - UtherSRG (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hrm.... copy-pasted back into main article space. I've reverted all of their edits from today, other than their question above, and blocked them for a week for DE. I'm edging towards a CIR indef. I think there is too much of a language barrier. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll go make some popcorn and watch the show... - UtherSRG (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- The discussion is taking place on my talk page. You are most welcome to contribute. Thank you for your compliment. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- I think we stand a chance. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cloaca, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:29, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you friendly bot! - UtherSRG (talk) 00:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
185.79.101.20
[edit]Hi UtherSRG, I saw you blocked 185.79.101.0/24 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and wanted to let you know, that you might want to consider also range blocking 185.79.100.0/22 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Might be more effective, since that range has basically all edits reverted since 2022. Nobody (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 15:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC)